Validation

 

  1. Bokinni Y, Shah N, Maguire O, Laidlaw DA. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements. Eye. 2015. 29, 1085–1091.
  2. Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012. Jul;96(7):987–90.
  3. Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Shah SP, Sivasubramaniam S, Bunce C, Cousens S. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011.Dec;9;52(13):9397–402.
  4. Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Rashid S, Hysi P. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity testchart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects. Eye (Lond). 2012. Apr;26(4):593–600.
  5. Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Brown G, Robson C. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart .Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):200–3.
  6. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Brown G, Robson C. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):200–3.
  7. Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the “compact reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart in amblyopic children. Laidlaw DA, Abbott A, Rosser DA. Br J Ophthalmol.2003 Oct;87(10):1232–4.
  8. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visualacuity assessment in population-based surveys. Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE. Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701–6.
  9. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device. Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA. Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701–6.
  10. How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2003 Aug;44(8):3278–81.
  11. The development of a “reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):432–6.